I'll be presenting on work in progress in collaboration with Bijan Pesaran's group (Yan Wong, Mariana Vigeral, David Putrino) and Josh Merel on building a high degree-of-freedom brain-machine interface. I'll focus on the Bayesian paradigm for decoding, and two practical problems for pushing that paradigm beyond the commonly-used Kalman filtering approach: building better likelihoods, and building better priors. The first amounts to fitting tuning curves for various neurons. Other groups have shown a nonlinear dependence of firing rate on hand position in 3D space, here I will show some preliminary results on fitting tuning curves for large numbers of joint angles. The second amounts to building better generative models of reach and grasp motions. As a first step in that direction, I've looked at PCA and ICA for reducing the dimension of reach-and-grasp signals.
We meet on Wednesdays at 1pm, in the 10th floor conference room of the Statistics Department, 1255 Amsterdam Ave, New York, NY.
Tuesday, March 27, 2012
David Pfau: March 27th (at 5PM)
Monday, March 19, 2012
Gustavo Lacerda: March 20th
Title: spatial regularization
Consider modeling each neuron as a 2-parameter logistic model (spiking probability as a function of stimulus intensity), and suppose we perform independent experiments on each neuron. Now imagine that the data isn't very informative, so we need to regularize our estimates. We can do spatial regularization by adding a quadratic penalty on the difference of estimates for nearby neurons. Now, suppose that there are *two* types of neurons, and that you only want to shrink together neurons of the same type. We don't want our estimate to be influenced by "false neighbors", i.e. neurons that are spatially close but of a different type. We discuss how to optimize this model. Finally, we explore the idea of Fused Group Lasso.
Consider modeling each neuron as a 2-parameter logistic model (spiking probability as a function of stimulus intensity), and suppose we perform independent experiments on each neuron. Now imagine that the data isn't very informative, so we need to regularize our estimates. We can do spatial regularization by adding a quadratic penalty on the difference of estimates for nearby neurons. Now, suppose that there are *two* types of neurons, and that you only want to shrink together neurons of the same type. We don't want our estimate to be influenced by "false neighbors", i.e. neurons that are spatially close but of a different type. We discuss how to optimize this model. Finally, we explore the idea of Fused Group Lasso.
Tuesday, February 21, 2012
Kamiar Rahnama Rad: Feb. 21
Two following questions will be discussed: 1. How does embedding low dimensional structures in high dimensional spaces decreases the learning complexity significantly? I will consider the simplest model, that is a linear transformation with additive noise. 2. Modern datasets are accumulated (and in some cases even stored) in a distributed or decentralized manner. Can distributed algorithms be designed to fit a global model over such datasets while retaining the performance of centralized estimators?
The talk will be based on the following two papers:
http://www.columbia.edu/~kr2248/papers/ieee-sparse.pdf
http://www.columbia.edu/~kr2248/papers/CDC2010-1.pdf
Monday, February 13, 2012
Bryan Conroy: Fed. 14th
Bryan Conroy will talk about a fast method for computing many related l2-regularized logistic regression problems, and about possible extensions to other GLMs, and l1-regularizers.
Friday, February 3, 2012
Eftychios P.: Jan. 31st and Feb. 7th
I am planning to lead a very informal discussion on some neat techniques for convex and semidefinite relaxation that can be used to transform intractable optimization problems into approximate but convex ones. I'll also discuss a few applications to statistical neuroscience that we are currently pursuing.
Some background material (although I'm not planning to go over any of these in detail) includes:
http://www.se.cuhk.edu.hk/~manchoso/papers/sdrapp-SPM.pdf
http://arxiv.org/abs/1012.0621
http://www-stat.stanford.edu/~candes/papers/PhaseRetrieval.pdf
http://users.cms.caltech.edu/~jtropp/papers/MT11-Two-Proposals-EJS.pdf
Some background material (although I'm not planning to go over any of these in detail) includes:
http://www.se.cuhk.edu.hk/~manchoso/papers/sdrapp-SPM.pdf
http://arxiv.org/abs/1012.0621
http://www-stat.stanford.edu/~candes/papers/PhaseRetrieval.pdf
http://users.cms.caltech.edu/~jtropp/papers/MT11-Two-Proposals-EJS.pdf
Monday, December 19, 2011
David Pfau: Dec. 20th
David will be giving a fly-by view of a number of cool papers from NIPS.
First is Empirical Models of Spiking in Neural Populations by Macke, Büsing, Cunningham, Yu, Shenoy and Mahani, where they evaluate the relative merits of GLMs with pairwise coupling and state space models on multielectrode recording in motor cortex.
Next, Quasi-Newton Methods for Markov Chain Monte Carlo by Zhang and Sutton looks at how to use approximate second-order methods like L-BFGS for MCMC while still preserving detailed balance.
Then, Demixed Principal Component Analysis is an extension of PCA which demixes the dependence of different latent dimensions on different observed parameters, and is used to analyze neural data from PFC
Finally, Learning to Learn with Compound Hierarchical-Deep Models, which combines a deep neural network for learning visual features with a hierarchical nonparametric Bayesian model for learning object categories to make one cool-looking demo.
Wednesday, December 7, 2011
Previous Group Meetings (for archival purposes)
Universal MAP Estimation in Compressed Sensing, by Baron and Duarte
Quantifying Statistical Interdependence by Message Passing on Graphs, by Dauwels, Vialatte, Weber and Chichocki. Part I and Part II
The No-U_Turn Sampler: Adaptively Setting Path Lengths in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, by Hoffman and Gelman.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)