Note that this seminar will be at 10:30am on Thursday, not the usual lab Wednesday lab meeting time.
Title: Optimal Control for Developing Somatosensory Neural Prosthetics
Abstract: Lost sensations, such as touch, could one day be restored by
electrical or optogenetic stimulation along the sensory neural
pathways. Used in conjunction with next-generation prosthetic limbs,
this stimulation could artificially provide cutaneous and
proprioceptive feedback to the user. Microstimulation of somatosensory
brain regions has been shown to produce modality and place-specific
percepts, and while psychophysical experiments in rats and primates
have elucidated the range of perceptual sensitivities to certain
stimulus parameters, not much work has been done for developing
encoding models for translating mechanical sensor readings to
microstimulation. Particularly, generating spatiotemporal patterns for
explicitly evoking naturalistic neural activation has not yet been
explored. We therefore approach the problem of building a sensory
neural prosthesis by first modeling the dynamical input-output
relationship between multichannel microstimulation and subsequent
field potentials, and then optimizing the input pattern for evoking
naturally occurring touch responses as closely as possible, while
constraining inputs within safety bounds and the operating regime of
our model. In my work, I focused on the hand regions of VPL thalamus
and S1 cortex of anesthetized rats and showed that such optimization
produces responses that are highly similar to their natural
counterparts. The evoked responses also preserved most of the
information of physical touch parameters such as amplitude and
stimulus location. This suggests that such stimulus optimization
approaches could be sufficient for restoring naturalistic levels of
information transfer for an afferent neuroprosthetic.
We meet on Wednesdays at 1pm, in the 10th floor conference room of the Statistics Department, 1255 Amsterdam Ave, New York, NY.
Friday, August 28, 2015
Josh Merel and Ari Pakman: August 19th
This week Josh and Ari will regale us with tales from their adventures
at the recent Deep Learning Summer School in Montreal. They'll discuss
trends and highlights and provide pointers to some interesting ideas.
Evan Archer: August 12th
For Wednesday's neurostat seminar I'll discuss three closely-related
papers that appeared at ICML this year:
• Variational Inference with Normalizing Flows
• Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics
• Markov Chain Monte Carlo and Variational Inference: Bridging the Gap
• Variational Inference with Normalizing Flows
• Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics
• Markov Chain Monte Carlo and Variational Inference: Bridging the Gap
Sunday, August 2, 2015
Daniel Soudry: July 29th
Daniel will discuss the following two papers, both concerning stochastic gradient Langevin dynamics:
• Bayesian Sampling Using Stochastic Gradient Thermostats
• Dark Bayesian Knowledge
• Bayesian Sampling Using Stochastic Gradient Thermostats
• Dark Bayesian Knowledge
Kishore Kuchibhotla: June 17th
Title:
Synaptic and circuit logic of task engagement in auditory cortex
Abstract:
Animals can adjust their behavior based on immediate context. A pedestrian will move rapidly away from traffic if she hears a car honk while crossing a street – executing a learned sensorimotor response. The same honk heard by the same pedestrian will not elicit this response if she is seated on a nearby park bench. How do neural circuits enable this type of behavior and flexibly encode the same stimuli in different contexts? Here we dissect the natural activity patterns of the same auditory stimuli in different contexts and show that attentional demands of a behavioral task transform the input-output function in auditory cortex via cholinergic modulation and local inhibition. Mice were trained to perform a go/no-go operant task in response to pure tones in one context (“active context”) and listen to the same pure tones but execute no behavioral response in another context (“passive”). In the active context, tone-evoked responses of layer 2/3 auditory cortical neurons were broadly suppressed when compared to the passive context but a specific sub-network showed increased activity. Neural responses shifted within 1-2 trials after the context switched. Whole-cell voltage clamp recordings in behaving mice showed larger context-dependent changes in inhibition than excitation, and the two sets of inputs sometimes changed in opposing directions. Attentional demands appear to reduce the necessity of co-tuned synaptic inputs, an otherwise established requirement in passive brain states. Task engagement elevated tone-evoked responses in PV-positive interneurons and suppressed VIP-positive interneuron responses, implicating both in the context-dependent changes to layer 2/3 output. Global behavioral context, in this case the attentional demands in the active context, was relayed to the auditory cortex by the nucleus basalis, as revealed by axonal calcium imaging of NB cholinergic projections. Thus, local synaptic inhibition gates long-range cholinergic modulation from NB to rapidly alter auditory cortical output, temporarily removing the requirement of co-tuned excitatory and inhibitory inputs, and improving perceptual flexibility.
Synaptic and circuit logic of task engagement in auditory cortex
Abstract:
Animals can adjust their behavior based on immediate context. A pedestrian will move rapidly away from traffic if she hears a car honk while crossing a street – executing a learned sensorimotor response. The same honk heard by the same pedestrian will not elicit this response if she is seated on a nearby park bench. How do neural circuits enable this type of behavior and flexibly encode the same stimuli in different contexts? Here we dissect the natural activity patterns of the same auditory stimuli in different contexts and show that attentional demands of a behavioral task transform the input-output function in auditory cortex via cholinergic modulation and local inhibition. Mice were trained to perform a go/no-go operant task in response to pure tones in one context (“active context”) and listen to the same pure tones but execute no behavioral response in another context (“passive”). In the active context, tone-evoked responses of layer 2/3 auditory cortical neurons were broadly suppressed when compared to the passive context but a specific sub-network showed increased activity. Neural responses shifted within 1-2 trials after the context switched. Whole-cell voltage clamp recordings in behaving mice showed larger context-dependent changes in inhibition than excitation, and the two sets of inputs sometimes changed in opposing directions. Attentional demands appear to reduce the necessity of co-tuned synaptic inputs, an otherwise established requirement in passive brain states. Task engagement elevated tone-evoked responses in PV-positive interneurons and suppressed VIP-positive interneuron responses, implicating both in the context-dependent changes to layer 2/3 output. Global behavioral context, in this case the attentional demands in the active context, was relayed to the auditory cortex by the nucleus basalis, as revealed by axonal calcium imaging of NB cholinergic projections. Thus, local synaptic inhibition gates long-range cholinergic modulation from NB to rapidly alter auditory cortical output, temporarily removing the requirement of co-tuned excitatory and inhibitory inputs, and improving perceptual flexibility.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)